Legal Opinion

Matteson v. Blaisdell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1921No. 22,140PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action in the district court for Waseca county to recover $3,000 for services. The case was tried before Childress, J., who at the close of the testimony denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and a jury which returned a verdict for $800. From an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In 1874 defendant, a farmer, married plaintiff’s mother, a widow. Plaintiff was then 9 years old, and became a member of the household. He now claims that at the age of about 14 years he undertook to leave the home and shift for himself; that, after a week’s absence, he was induced to return and work for defendant during the balance of his minority upon defendant’s promise that he should receive the “back forty” when defendant died; and that plaintiff fully performed his part, but that defendant, shortly before the commencement of this action, broke the agreement by conveying the “back forty”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gibson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Gilbert v. HewetsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Schmitt v. HagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Hardwick v. IcklerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. William Lewis v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  5. Albert v. Edgewater Beach Building Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API