Legal Opinion
Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 16, 1989No. C1-88-641PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
Appellant Don Levin obtained review of a court of appeals decision affirming summary judgment on Levin’s claim for unpaid commissions due pursuant to an employment contract with respondent C.O.M.B. Co. Judgment was granted summarily on alternative grounds: as a matter of law, either Levin’s claim for unpaid commissions was barred by the two-year statute of limitations or the contract had been rescinded. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
In June 1979 Levin and C.O.M.B. entered into a two-year employment agreement. The agreement provided that for his services as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Country Club Oil Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Roaderick v. Lull Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Bachertz v. Hayes-Lucas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Desnick v. MastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Parkhill v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- James M. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc., James M. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- MORGAN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSUR. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.