Legal Opinion
State v. Barnecut
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1988No. 30-CA-87PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMilligan, J.
Defendant-appellant, Paul W. Barnecut, was indicted on six counts of sexual misconduct. The fifth count of the indictment was dismissed at trial because the victim did not testify about any sexual misconduct on appellant’s part for the year indicated in the indictment. The indictment otherwise provided:
COUNT VIOLATION VICTIM DATE/TIME OF OFFENSE
One 2907.05(A)(3) Lee Ann Friesner On a date certain during the month of May 1983, when age nine.
Two 2907.05(A)(3) Lee Ann Friesner On a date certain during the month of June 1983, when age nine.
COUNT VIOLATION VICTIM DATE/TIME OF OFFENSE
Three…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GingellOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. D.B.S.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. BlankenburgOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. VitaleOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Alan Geboy, Petitioner-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Anthony Brigano, Warden, Respondent-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- State v. LawrinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.