State v. Lawrinson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The sole issue is whether the state must provide a more specific bill óf particulars upon a proper request by the accused when the state possesses the information. We find that under the circumstances of this case, the state must provide a more specific bill of particulars.
In State v. Sellards (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 169, 17 OBR 410, 478 N.E. 2d 781, we stated in the syllabus that “[i]n a criminal prosecution the state must, in response to a request for a bill of particulars or demand for discovery, supply specific dates and times with *239regard to an alleged offense where it possesses such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. BarnecutOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. HensleyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Erickson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Alan Geboy, Petitioner-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Anthony Brigano, Warden, Respondent-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- State v. AveryOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.