Bieker v. Suttons Bay Township Supervisor
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
Plaintiff, Ruth A. Bieker, brought this action for a writ of mandamus to compel defendant, the supervisor of Suttons Bay Township in Leelanau County, to comply with the provisions of the opening of private roads and temporary highways act, MCL 229.1 et seq.) MSA 9.281 et seq. The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint under MCR 2.116(C)(8) because this Court had declared the act unconstitutional in White Pine Hunting Club v Schalkofski, 65 Mich App 147; 237 NW2d 223 (1975). Plaintiff appeals as of right. We reverse.
Plaintiff’s land is surrounded by private property owned by others. On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Shizas v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Marinclin v. UrlingDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Dowling v. EricksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- White Pine Hunting Club v. SchalkofskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tolksdorf v. GriffithMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- McKeighan v. Grass Lake Township SupervisorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- McKeigan v. Grass Lake Township SupervisorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Bieker v. Suttons Bay Township SupervisorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- McKeigan v. Grass Lake Township SupervisorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.