Legal Opinion

Tolksdorf v. Griffith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2001No. Docket 115032PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

This case involves the constitutionality of the Opening of Private Roads and Temporary Highways Act (the private roads act), MCL 229.1 et seq. The key issue is whether the act provides for an unconstitutional taking under art 10, § 2 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963. We hold that it does because the act authorizes a taking and the taking primarily benefits a private rather than a public purpose. For that reason, we strike down the act as unconstitutional.

I. THE HISTORY OF THE PRIVATE ROADS ACT

Both the Michigan and federal constitutions prohibit the taking of private property for public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Blank v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. City of Kentwood v. Sommerdyke EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. White Pine Hunting Club v. SchalkofskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Dyer v. ThurstonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. People v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Phillips v. Mirac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2005 Pa 71Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. William Daniels and Judy Daniels v. The Area Plan Commission of Allen CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API