Legal Opinion
Marinclin v. Urling
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 10, 1967No. Civ. A. 66-1318PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action invoke the jurisdiction of this court under § 1331, Title 28 U.S.C.A., alleging that the matter in controversy exceeds the sum of $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and presents a federal question.
“The several courts of quarter sessions shall, in open court as aforesaid, upon the petition of one or more persons, associations, partnerships, stock companies, or corporations, for a road from their respective lands or leaseholds to a highway or place of necessary public resort, or to any private way leading to a highway, * *…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Clark v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Strickley v. Highland Boy Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Palairet's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Pocopson RoadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Opening a Private Road for the Benefit of O'ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- In Re Opening Private Road Ex Rel. O'ReillyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- T.L.C. Services, Inc. v. KaminCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Cirelli v. EntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- In Re Private Road in East Rockhill Tp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.