Legal Opinion

McKeighan v. Grass Lake Township Supervisor

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1999No. Docket 195437PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Pursuant to MCR 7.215(H), this special panel was convened to resolve the conflict between the prior vacated opinion in this case, reported as McKeigan v Grass Lake Twp Supervisor, 229 Mich App 801 (1998), and Bieker v Suttons Bay Twp Supervisor, 197 Mich App 628; 496 NW2d 398 (1992). In accordance with MCR 7.215(H), the prior McKeigan panel was required to follow the precedent set by Bieker. Were it not for the precedential effect of Bieker, the McKeigan panel would have affirmed the decision of the lower court.

Following an en banc order1 invoking the conflict resolution procedure, this case…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. NashMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. McQuillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re AyresMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. In Re Opening a Private Road for the Benefit of O'ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Citizens for Protection of Marriage v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. White-Bey v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In Re Opening Private Road Ex Rel. O'ReillyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API