Legal Opinion

Bieker v. Suttons Bay Township Supervisor

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1992No. Docket 139955Published

1Opinion of the Court

197 Mich. App. 628 (1992)

496 N.W.2d 398

BIEKER

v.

SUTTONS BAY TOWNSHIP SUPERVISOR

Docket No. 139955.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided December 29, 1992, at 9:05 A.M..

Flickinger & Associates, P.C. (by Mary A. Owens), for the plaintiff.

James R. Williams, for the defendant.

Before: SHEPHERD, P.J., and CONNOR and M.F. SAPALA,[*] JJ.

CONNOR, J.

Plaintiff, Ruth A. Bieker, brought this action for a writ of mandamus to compel defendant, the supervisor of Suttons Bay Township in Leelanau County, to comply with the provisions of the opening of private roads and temporary highways act, MCL 229.1 et seq.; MSA…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Shizas v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Marinclin v. UrlingDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Dowling v. EricksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. White Pine Hunting Club v. SchalkofskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API