Banwait v. Hernandez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
In this case we hold that an attorney who was appointed a neutral arbitrator under section 1281.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure did not have to disclose that he had been represented as a client by the law firm representing one of the parties to the arbitration (though not by the attorney conducting the arbitration), where the representation had concluded at least seven months before the arbitration and had involved less than four hours of the firm’s time and fees of less than $400. (All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise noted.)
Proc…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Britz, Inc. v. Alfa-Laval Food & Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Luster v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.