Legal Opinion
Britz, Inc. v. Alfa-Laval Food & Dairy Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 8, 1995No. F020306PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VARTABEDIAN, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment confirming an arbitration award. Appellants primarily contend that arbitration should not have been compelled in the first instance and that the arbitrator failed to disclose certain conflicts of interest. We reverse the judgment and remand the matter to superior court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Facts and Procedural History
The Underlying Controversy.
The merits of the underlying controversy are not before us in this appeal. (Moncharsh v. Hetty & Blase (1992) 3 Cal.4th 1,11 [10 Cal.Rptr.2d 183, 832 P.2d 899].)…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Pierotti v. TorianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Bullock v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.