Legal Opinion

Lincoln Street Railway Co. v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1901No. 10,609PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Emton from the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before I-Iolmes, J. ¡Sections 70 and 77 of the act of 1887 violate section 7, article 9, of the constitution. Ríale v. Wheeler, 33 Nebr., 503. The right granted by the city to the railway company to use the streets was a contract. The act of 1887 inipan ed the obligation of such contract, and is inimical to the federal constitution. Chicago v.SheldonM Wall. [U.B.], 50; Coast L. R. Co. v. Mayor, 30 Fed.

Read the full summary

Emton from the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before I-Iolmes, J. ¡Sections 70 and 77 of the act of 1887 violate section 7, article 9, of the constitution. Ríale v. Wheeler, 33 Nebr., 503. The right granted by the city to the railway company to use the streets was a contract. The act of 1887 inipan ed the obligation of such contract, and is inimical to the federal constitution. Chicago v.SheldonM Wall. [U.B.], 50; Coast L. R. Co. v. Mayor, 30 Fed. He])., 010; Million v._ Sharp, 27 X. Y., Oil; Mayor r. Second Avenue R. Co., 32 N. Y„ 201; People v. O'Brien, 111 N. Y., 1, 40;…

1Opinion of the Court

Hoi/’.omb, J.

The Lincoln Street Railway Company and the New York Security & Trust Company, mortgagee of its property in (rust, by proceedings in error to obtain a review of the trial had in the district court, pray a reversal of *117the judgment therein rendered in favor of the city of Lincoln, plaintiff in the court below, for the sum of $108,526.58, principal and interest, and $2,915.60, penalties, for taxes or obligations in the nature of special assessments levied by the city of Lincoln on the property of the street railway company, plaintiff in error, as well as certain assessments levied…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Davis v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Shields v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Railroad Co. v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Williams v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1853

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. State ex rel. Haberlan v. LoveNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. McPhee & McGinnity Co. v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Wittler v. BaumgartnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Board of Control v. BucksteggeArizona Supreme Court · 1916

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API