Legal Opinion

Wittler v. Baumgartner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1966No. 36269PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff, Clarence Wittier, as an elector residing in Platte County and an owner of bonds issued by Loup River Public Power District, asserting the unconstitutionality of Legislative Bill 764, Laws 1965, chapter 404, page 1292, enacted by the Legislature at its Seventy-Fifth Session, which we shall hereafter refer to as the “Act.”

The parties, defendant are the 11 appointed and acting directors of the public corporation created by the Act; the Loupi River Public Power District, a public corporation engaged in the generation, transmission, and distribution of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. United Community Services v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State ex rel. Wheeler v. StuhtNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Omaha Parking Authority v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State ex rel. Harris v. HansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Nebraska Mortgage Finance FundNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. City of Scottsbluff v. TiemannNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bradner v. HammondAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Chase v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API