NIPPON HODO COMPANY, Ltd., v. UNITED STATES; FUIJI SANGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA v. UNITED STATES
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs are Japanese corporations suing the United States on contract claims. In both cases, the defendant sought and was granted a separate trial on the issue of jurisdiction of this court; namely, whether such jurisdiction extends to suits against the United States by citizens of Japan. These cases were consolidated for trial of this mutual jurisdictional issue.
The plaintiffs proved that American citizens, in suits against the Government of Japan, are treated before the courts of Japan no less favorably than Japanese nationals. It is the defendant’s main contention,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Great Northern Life Insurance Co. v. ReadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Marcos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Marcos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- United States v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Brodie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Company and Salah El Din Ahmed Mohammed Idris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Teresa Alen Ferreiro, Dorothy Erasmo Jeffers, and Mario Vazquez Lopez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Mexican Intermodal Equipment S.A. de C.V. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Pottawatomi Nation in Canada v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.