Legal Opinion

Marcos v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 5, 1952No. 50278PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Judge.

On August 14, 1951, plaintiff filed suit to recover $594,900, which represents' the alleged value of 2,366 head of cattle requisitioned from his ranch during the period from December 9, 1941 to January 28, 1942 by the United States Army forces operating on the Island of Mindanao in the Philippines. Defendant has moved, pursuant to Rule 16(b), 28 U.S.C., to dismiss plaintiff’s petition on the ground that the claim is barred by the Statute of Limitations, 28 U.S.C.(Supp.IV) § 2501, 62 Stat. 976. Defendant concedes that the running of the Statute of Limitations is suspended in time…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hanger v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Semmes v. Hartford Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. United States v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Tan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  5. Salvoni v PilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Marcos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Teresa Alen Ferreiro, Dorothy Erasmo Jeffers, and Mario Vazquez Lopez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Tan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  5. Sese v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API