Legal Opinion

El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 14, 2003No. 00-443LPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BASKIR, Judge.

This “takings” case arises out of terrorist attacks against the United States in 1998 and the American military response to these attacks. It comes before the Court on the Government’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. Because we find that the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment “just compensation” clause does not extend to claims arising out of the destruction of a purported enemy war-making instrumentality through American military action, we GRANT the Defendant’s motion and dismiss the Complaint.

*753 BACKGROUND

A. The Precipitating…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. Verdugo-UrquidezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. El-Shifa Pharmaceutical Industries Company and Salah El Din Ahmed Mohammed Idris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Norman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Atamirzayeva v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API