Legal Opinion
Dincher v. Marlin Firearms Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 28, 1952No. 22347_1PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The sole question presented is whether the cause of action was barred by § 8324 of the Connecticut Statutes (Revision 1949) which provides, in pertinent part, as follows :
“Limitation of action for injury to person or property. No action to recover damages for injury to the person, * * * caused by negligence, * * shall be brought but within one year from the date of the act or omission complained of, * *
The plaintiff, a citizen of Pennsylvania, invoked the diversity jurisdiction of the court to bring this suit on April 19, 1951 against a Connecticut corporation whose…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Borucki v. MacKenzie Brothers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Ciccarelli v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Wyatt v. A-Best, CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.