Legal Opinion

McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning Company

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1975PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

This products liability action presents the question of when the statute of limitations begins to run.

I

The cause of action for personal injuries and wrongful death is based upon an al*488legedly defective gas furnace. Named as parties defendant are the manufacturer, the distributor, the general contractor, the sub-contractor and installer, and the owners of the apartment building. Recovery is predicated upon negligence, strict liability, misrepresentation and breach of warranty.

The record reflects that the gas furnace was manufactured in 1967 and distributed and installed on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Caudill v. Wise Rambler, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  4. Everhart v. Rich's, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Dincher v. Marlin Firearms Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hunter v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Dorothy Johnson v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API