Legal Opinion

Foote Bros. Gear & Machine Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 4, 1929No. H-438Published

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, Judge

The plaintiff, during the period in question, made and sold timing gears used in the functioning of internal-combustion engines. These gears were made both of metallic and nonmetallic materials. The special purpose and design of the nonmetallic gears was to reduce the noise made by the-operation of the engine, and they were advertised as “ silent timing gears ” and could be used interchangeably upon many varieties of combustion engines not used for automobiles or trucks, but there is no evidence that any of the so-called “ silent timing gears ” were so used.

The gears that were taxed were sold…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole Storage Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  2. Walker Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  3. Edison Storage Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. Borg & Beck Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  5. Advance Automobile Accessories Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API