Legal Opinion

Advance Automobile Accessories Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 22, 1928No. H-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoss, Judge

During the period involved in this controversy plaintiff was engaged in the manufacture of transmission linings for Ford automobiles, and the sale of same to the automobile jobbing trade. Between the dates June 1, 1922, and February 26, 1926, plaintiff paid taxes in the aggregate sum of $32,768.35, same having been assessed under the provisions of subdivision (3) of section 900 of the revenue act of 1921, and subdivision (3) of section 600 of the revenue act of 1924. On June 7,1926, plaintiff filed a claim for the refund of said taxes, which claim was rejected by the Commissioner of Internal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worth Brothers Co. v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crawford Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  2. Autoquip Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  3. Foote Bros. Gear & Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. Imperial Brass Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API