Legal Opinion

Cole Storage Battery Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 2, 1928No. D-784PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Judge

Plaintiff sues to recover excise taxes claimed to have been illegally exacted by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue over a period extending from February 28, 1922, to November 30, 1923. The amount of tax paid is $4,963.06. The *168plaintiff is an Illinois corporation engaged' in the manufacture and sale of storage batteries. The batteries taxed and upon which this suit is founded were batteries designed for use in automobiles. The commissioner assessed and collected the tax under section 900 of the revenue acts of 1918-1919. This section and its subdivisions read as follows:

From and after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Atwater Kent Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  3. Martin Rocking Fifth Wheel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  4. National Rubber Filler Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fairmount Tool & Forging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  2. Edison Storage Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  3. Borg & Beck Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. General Lead Batteries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. W. M. Dutton & Sons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API