Legal Opinion
Edison Storage Battery Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 6, 1929No. NOS. F-359 AND H-322; NOS. F-358 AND H-324; NOS. F-403 AND H-323PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge
There are involved here six cases which by order of the court dated May 11, 1928, were consolidated. Two suits each brought by the three corporations by agreement were briefed, argued, and submitted as one case.
The details of the relations and operations of these corporations are set out in the findings, and it is not necessary for the decision to rehearse them here.
They are seeking a refund of taxes assessed on storage batteries manufactured and sold for motive power for electrically-propelled automobile trucks.
The question involved is whether or not storage batteries manufactured and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Wickwire v. ReineckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. RindskopfSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Lead Batteries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Bassick Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Autoquip Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Foote Bros. Gear & Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.