Legal Opinion

Borg & Beck Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 11, 1929No. H-437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, Judge

The evidence shows that the plaintiff is a manufacturer of clutches for internal-combustion engines, including parts of such clutches. The various types of clutches manufactured by plaintiff were adapted for use on automobiles, trucks,- and tractors, and were used for that purpose. The plaintiff was required to pay an excise tax on certain of the parts of such clutches, and, claiming that they were not subject to tax under the provisions of the law with reference to automobile parts and accessories, now brings this suit to recover the taxes so paid.

The evidence also shows that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atwater Kent Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  2. Cole Storage Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  3. Milwaukee Motor Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crawford Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  2. Bassick Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  3. Autoquip Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. Foote Bros. Gear & Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  5. Imperial Brass Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API