Miranda v. MacIas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
Plaintiffs Angel and Mary Miranda, James and Patricia Unger and Juan and Ma Teresa Hernandez appeal a judgment of foreclosure ordering the sheriff to sell certain real property to satisfy a lien secured by a deed of tmst. We hold the trial court erred in refusing to apply the rationale of Wellenkamp v. Bank of America (1978) 21 Cal.3d 943 [148 Cal.Rptr. 379, 582 P.2d 970], and reverse.
Factual and Procedural Background
On March 29, 1978, the Mirandas and the Ungers purchased certain commercial real property from Salvador Macias. Macias took back a promissory note secured by deed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lucas v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Fernandez v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984