Legal Opinion

Miranda v. MacIas

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1983No. Civ. 26081PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

Plaintiffs Angel and Mary Miranda, James and Patricia Unger and Juan and Ma Teresa Hernandez appeal a judgment of foreclosure ordering the sheriff to sell certain real property to satisfy a lien secured by a deed of tmst. We hold the trial court erred in refusing to apply the rationale of Wellenkamp v. Bank of America (1978) 21 Cal.3d 943 [148 Cal.Rptr. 379, 582 P.2d 970], and reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

On March 29, 1978, the Mirandas and the Ungers purchased certain commercial real property from Salvador Macias. Macias took back a promissory note secured by deed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lucas v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Fernandez v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API