Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Jones

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1983No. Civ. No. 30171PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

Sellers (Jones) sold two parcels of real property in 1973, carrying secondary financing for the buyers. When the buyers transferred the property to subsequent purchasers (Lucas) subject to sellers’ loan in *10101979, Jones sought to enforce the due-on-sale clause in the promissory note and the deed of trust securing the property. The second sale occurred after the decision in Wellenkamp v. Bank of America (1978) 21 Cal.3d 943 [148 Cal.Rptr. 379, 582 P.2d 970], where the Supreme Court prohibited automatic enforcement of due-on-sale clauses as unreasonable restraints on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dawn Investment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Miranda v. MacIasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fernandez v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API