Lachow v. Kimmich
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentNorth, J.
Plaintiff’s right of recovery depends upon determination of whether an adult passenger in the automobile of a private carrier for hire is chargeable with imputed negligence in case the negligence of such private carrier is a proximate cause of a collision with another automobile resulting in injury to the passenger. The rule of law is well settled that negligence of a common carrier will not be imputed to a passenger for hire. Cuddy v. Horn, 46 Mich. 596 (41 Am. Rep. 178); Galloway v. Railway, 168 Mich. 343. It has been considered equally well settled by a long unbroken line of decisions in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Cuddy v. HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Colborne v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.