Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lachow v. Kimmich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1933No. Docket No. 185, Calendar No. 36,796Published

1DissentNorth, J.

Plaintiff’s right of recovery depends upon determination of whether an adult passenger in the automobile of a private carrier for hire is chargeable with imputed negligence in case the negligence of such private carrier is a proximate cause of a collision with another automobile resulting in injury to the passenger. The rule of law is well settled that negligence of a common carrier will not be imputed to a passenger for hire. Cuddy v. Horn, 46 Mich. 596 (41 Am. Rep. 178); Galloway v. Railway, 168 Mich. 343. It has been considered equally well settled by a long unbroken line of decisions in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Cuddy v. HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Colborne v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API