Legal Opinion

Cuddy v. Horn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1881PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. 'Cask. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

The following statement of facts taken from the briefs of counsel for the defendants is sufficiently full and accurate for a definite understanding and discussion of the legal questions raised.

The action was commenced by the plaintiff as administrator of the estate of John Kelley, deceased, to recover damages on account of his death caused by a collision between the steamer “Garland,” of which the defendant Horn was owner, and the steam-yacht “Mamie,” owned by the other defendants, on the Detroit river, July22d, 1880. The deck-*600ration alleged in substance that the Garland was going down the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colegrove v. New York & New Haven RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. American Transportation Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Cooper v. . Eastern Transportation CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bricker v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Maddux v. DonaldsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Feneff v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API