Martin v. Going
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
The appeal in this case was taken from a judgment for the sum of $485.30 entered against appellant.
Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that he had acquired by assignment three claims for farm labor performed by individuals upon the ranch of appellant. He alleged that one Martin performed labor from July 11 to August 5, 1920, at the reasonable value of $81.40; that one Clark performed labor from July 4 to August 5, 1920-, at the value of $68, and one Long performed labor from the 31st of May to August 5, 1920, at the reasonable value of $115.40. These claims totaled the sum of $264.80. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Jonas v. FieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Wakefield v. GreenhoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Gard v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Barlow v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Anglin v. ConwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re MoffettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.