Legal Opinion

In Re Moffett

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1936No. Crim. 190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Petitioner filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus to secure his release from the jail of Tulare County, where he was confined by the sheriff under a judgment of a justice of the peace sitting in Orosi Township in Tulare County. The only return made by the sheriff to the writ is the order under which petitioner was held. Its sufficiency is not attacked and for the purposes of this opinion we will assume its sufficiency tad proper form. No brief has been filed on behalf of the sheriff or in support of the legality of the detention- of petitioner.

The facts shown by the record before us…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re MoffettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. In Re MoffettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API