Legal Opinion
Nordling v. Johnston
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1955PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
This action was brought, pursuant to statute, to recover wages, a penalty, and attorney’s fees. ORS 652.140; Oregon Laws 1947, ch 193 (ORS 652.150); OCLA § 102-607 (ORS 652.200). From a judgment for plaintiff based on a verdict of the jury the defendant has appealed.
The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that between June 5 and June 12, 1950, defendant employed the plaintiff, Walter Newman and John Jacobsen as “fallers and buckers” of certain timber near Vernonia, Oregon, at the agreed and stipulated wage of $2.50 per M of timber felled and bucked; $1.50 per M for all timber felled, and for…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Leep v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Cox v. . Lykes BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Great American Insurance v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Hekker v. Sabre Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Sabin v. Willamette-Western CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Mamika v. BarcaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.