Legal Opinion

Anglin v. Conway

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1953No. L. A. 22799PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

—Plaintiff, as assignee of eight separate claims for labor and services rendered, brought suit against Alline E. Conway, the estate of H. A. Conway, deceased, and George Harwood. The latter defendant was not served with summons. The defendant estate was found not to be liable, and judgment totaling $2,383.80 was entered only against defendant Alline E. Conway. She appeals on these grounds: (1) lack of proof of the assignment of the labor claims involved; and (2) insufficiency of the evidence to establish the employer-employee relationship between herself and respondent’s assignors. Her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. McClenahan v. KeyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Ford v. BushardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Swim v. JuhlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nikolaus v. HoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Guillen v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Lucas v. Quigley Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. BatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC v. Summit Healthcare etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API