Legal Opinion

109 North, LLC v. Planning Com'n of Town of New Milford

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 18, 2008No. AC 28682PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

This appeal concerns the application of the automatic approval doctrine. The plaintiff, 109 North, LLC, appeals from the summary judgment on its mandamus action rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, the planning commission of the town of New Milford. The plaintiffs principal claim is that the court improperly concluded that the defendant acted on the plaintiffs subdivision application within the time limits prescribed by General Statutes §§ 8-26 and 8-26d. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The facts largely are undisputed.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Miles v. FoleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Finn v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diamond 67, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. South Windsor v. LanataConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API