Legal Opinion

State v. Panek

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 1996No. 93-06-33869; CA A83327PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of attempted aggravated first degree theft by deception. ORS 164.015; ORS 164.057; ORS 164.085. He assigns error to the denial of his motion for acquittal, made at the end of the prosecution’s case, in which he contended that the state had failed to prove that venue was in Multnomah County. We reverse.

Defendant suffered an on-the-job injury and was treated at a hospital in Portland, which is located in Multnomah County. He incurred medical charges in excess of $25,000. Defendant was self-employed and did not have workers’ compensation coverage. However,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HastingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RitchieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. PughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API