Legal Opinion

State v. Pugh

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 2013No. 081191; A148574PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant was convicted on 18 counts of first-degree encouraging child sexual abuse, ORS 163.684 (2001).1 He appeals the trial court’s denial of his motions for a judgment of acquittal based on the state’s failure to prove that he knowingly duplicated an image of sexually explicit conduct involving a child and the state’s failure to prove venue. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.

In reviewing a denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal, we view the facts in the light most favorable to the state to determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found the elements of the crime…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. BrayOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. BargerOregon Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walton v. MyrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Department of Human Services v. S. R. H.Lane County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API