State v. Ritchie
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction on 20 counts of encouraging child sexual abuse in the second degree. ORS 163.686. In support of his first and fourth assignments of error, defendant asserts that the trial court erred by denying his motions for judgments of acquittal. Defendant first argues that the state did not elicit sufficient evidence to show that defendant knowingly possessed or controlled child pornography. In support of his fourth assignment of error, defendant argues that the state did not elicit sufficient evidence to establish venue as to Counts 11 through 20. We conclude…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Andrew William BetnarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Commonwealth v. DiodoroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- State v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. RitchieOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. TildenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Hardin v. PopoffMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. PughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.