Legal Opinion

State v. Hastings

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 1977No. 77-1533-G, CA 8759PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtle R, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction under ORS 498.042(2), 1 waste of a game animal (elk), raising five assignments of error. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and at the conclusion of the state’s case, defendant moved for judgment of acquittal, contending, inter alia, that the state failed to prove venue in Josephine County. The trial judge denied the motion, defendant rested and the court found defendant guilty and entered judgment accordingly. Because of our disposition of the case, we consider only the state’s failure to establish proper venue.

Venue is a material allegation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CookseyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Kepl v. Manzanita CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. LedderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  2. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. PanekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API