Walker v. Walker
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROWLEY, Judge:
Appellant is a nineteen year old, mentally retarded woman who seeks relief from the trial court’s order, entered in a custody proceeding, that she visit her mother, undergo a psychological examination, and attend family counseling. In this appeal, appellant argues, inter alia, 1 that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction since she was eighteen years old at the time the trial court issued its order and was no longer a “child” as defined by statute.
Appellant’s parents were separated in 1973 and divorced in 1974. Appellant lived with her mother from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Fernald v. FernaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Fenstamaker v. FenstamakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Cady v. WeberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Schmidt v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by10 opinions
- G.B. v. M.M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- G.B. v. M.M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Liles v. BalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Cogan v. County of BeaverCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.