Legal Opinion

Walker v. Walker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 1987No. 221PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROWLEY, Judge:

Appellant is a nineteen year old, mentally retarded woman who seeks relief from the trial court’s order, entered in a custody proceeding, that she visit her mother, undergo a psychological examination, and attend family counseling. In this appeal, appellant argues, inter alia, 1 that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction since she was eighteen years old at the time the trial court issued its order and was no longer a “child” as defined by statute.

Appellant’s parents were separated in 1973 and divorced in 1974. Appellant lived with her mother from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Fernald v. FernaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Fenstamaker v. FenstamakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Cady v. WeberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Schmidt v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. G.B. v. M.M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. G.B. v. M.M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Liles v. BalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Cogan v. County of BeaverCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API