Legal Opinion

Liles v. Balmer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1994PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the final order of the trial court which denied appellant’s motion for removal of a compulsory nonsuit entered against her.

Appellant presents the following issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for compulsory nonsuit; (2) whether the trial court utilized an erroneous standard in excluding appellant’s testimony where her recollection of the accident was elicited while under sodium pentothal/hypnosis and she had no independent recall of the details of the accident prior to the sodium pentothal/hypnosis; (3)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. NazarovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Matter of CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Sinclair by Sinclair v. BlockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hill v. OfaltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Rachlin v. EdmisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Nobles, J. v. Staples, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Murphy, P. v. International Druidic SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API