Legal Opinion

Fenstamaker v. Fenstamaker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1985No. 1378, 1574, 1913, and 2156PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

These consolidated appeals arise from four orders entered by the trial court, each holding appellant in contempt. 1 The orders were issued during the course of a non-jury trial for divorce, equitable distribution, alimony and other relief.

The parties were married in August of 1959 and separated in August of 1976. Since sometime prior to their separation, appellant, an attorney, has been employed as chief executive officer of Radiant Steel Products Company, owned principally by the two parties. Appellee filed the instant action pursuant to the Divorce Code, 23 P.S. § 101 et…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. In Re MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. In Re Grand Jury, April Term, Wayne Cty.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. KolanskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Marian Shop, Inc. v. BairdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Fox v. GablerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. In re C.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API