Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Schmidt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1983No. 58PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*85WIEAND, Judge:*

Can a twenty-six year old woman, who is a victim of Down’s Syndrome and has the mental ability of a child between the ages of four and a half and eight years, be compelled by court order to visit a parent against her will? The trial judge concluded, in a thoughtful and concerned adjudication, that the daughter should be compelled to visit her father but only under circumstances carefully circumscribed by safeguards intended to protect her emotional and psychological well-being. Despite the care which the trial judge exercised in attempting to resolve this difficult issue, we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DeWalt v. DeWaltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Trosky v. MannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. State of Wis. Ex Rel. Southwell v. ChamberlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Borovetz v. BorovetzCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API