Schmidt v. Schmidt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*85WIEAND, Judge:*
Can a twenty-six year old woman, who is a victim of Down’s Syndrome and has the mental ability of a child between the ages of four and a half and eight years, be compelled by court order to visit a parent against her will? The trial judge concluded, in a thoughtful and concerned adjudication, that the daughter should be compelled to visit her father but only under circumstances carefully circumscribed by safeguards intended to protect her emotional and psychological well-being. Despite the care which the trial judge exercised in attempting to resolve this difficult issue, we…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- DeWalt v. DeWaltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Trosky v. MannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- State of Wis. Ex Rel. Southwell v. ChamberlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Borovetz v. BorovetzCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.