Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Condon v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 30, 2003No. 25670PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE TOAL:
Appellant, Attorney General Condon (“Attorney General”), filed an objection to the circuit court’s award of attorneys’ fees to counsel for Respondents (“Respondents”).
Factual / Procedural Background
Respondents filed a class action suit on behalf of C. Bruce Littlejohn, and those similarly situated against the State of South Carolina and the Department of Revenue (“DOR”) on July 10, 2000. The complaint alleged that plaintiff Littlejohn and other South Carolina citizens 85 years of age and older had failed to receive the one percent sales tax exemption provided for in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Paul, Johnson, Alston & Hunt v. GraultyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Baron Data Systems, Inc. v. LoterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- In Re Estate of TomlinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Layman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Bradacs v. HaleyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
- Wachesaw Plantation East Community Services Ass'n v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Gillespie v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Town of Sullivan's Island v. Nathan BluesteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026