Legal Opinion

Bradacs v. Haley

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided November 10, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-02351-JMCPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

J. MICHELLE CHILDS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Katherine Bradacs (“Bradacs”) and Tracie Goodwin (“Goodwin”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking “to challenge the constitutionality of South Carolina’s laws and constitutional provisions that deny legal recognition in South Carolina to the marriages of same-sex couples who are married in one of the many states and numerous foreign countries where same-sex marriages are legal.” (ECF No. 41 at 1 ¶ 1 (citing S.C. Const. Art. XVII, § 15; S.C.Code § 20-1-15 (1976)).)

This…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Disability Rights South Carolina v. Henry McMasterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Condon v. HaleyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
  3. Bradacs v. HaleyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
  4. Barnett v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
  5. Byers v. Pinnacle Converting Equipment And Services LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API