Legal Opinion

Wachesaw Plantation East Community Services Ass'n v. Alexander

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 4, 2015No. Appellate Case 2012-213400; 27585PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty

This action arose out of the foreclosure of a lien for delinquent homeowner regime fees against Todd C. Alexander. Alexander did not appeal the foreclosure; however, he moved to vacate the resulting sale. Alexander’s motion to vacate the sale was denied and Alexander appealed. The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal, finding Alexander failed to comply with section 18-9-170 1 of the South Carolina Code to stay the sale and, therefore, the master-in-equity’s issuance of the deed rendered the appeal moot.

I. Facts

Alexander purchased a home for his elderly father in Mur-rells Inlet, South…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. GrovensteinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Linda Mc Co., Inc. v. ShoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Heritage Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Eagle Lake & Golf CondominiumsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Antrum v. Hartsville Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SC Coastal Conservation League v. Dominion EnergySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
  2. SC Coastal Conservation League v. Dominion EnergySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
  3. SC Coastal Conservation League v. Dominion EnergySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API