Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Speed
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 23, 1997No. 24639PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
This dispute arose over a transaction involving a 1969 Jaguar automobile and the alleged representations made to respondents on the condition of the vehicle. Appellants appealed the jury verdict in favor of respondents and the trial judge’s award of attorney’s fees. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondents (Mr. and Mrs. Jackson) initiated this action against all defendants alleging fraud, revocation of acceptance, 1 and violation of the Regulation of Manufacturers, Distributors, and Dealers Act, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 56-15-10 to - 180 (1991) (Dealers Act). Respondents effectively served all…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Rush v. BlanchardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Strother v. Lexington County Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Historic Charleston Holdings, LLC v. MallonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Layman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.