Lange v. Andrus
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.
In our opinion the “affirmative defense” in Kinateder’s answer to the cross complaint fails to state facts constituting a defense to the claim for breach of warranty, and therefore the demurrer must be sustained.
1. The metes-and-bounds description in the deed appears to have included the three-acre tract without ambiguity, and no claim is made to the contrary. Since the warranty of title, imported into the deed by force of sec. 235.0.6 (2), Stats., extends to all the described land, the grantors cannot escape the consequences of their warranty with respect to the three-acre strip unless they…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Krakow v. WilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Langer v. Stegerwald Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Journal Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Lumbermen's National Bank of Menominee v. CorriganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Kleih v. Van SchoyckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. OsbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Lee v. JunkansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Clark v. MoruWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Breeden v. BreedenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Schimmel v. DundonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.