Kleih v. Van Schoyck
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
As appears from the foregoing statement of facts, the action is in equity for injunctional relief. The judgment enjoins the defendant from traveling along or across the right of way and from trespassing on the strip of land on which it is located; from inviting the public to travel across or upon or trespass upon said strip of land; from permitting cattle belonging to or cared for by the defendant to enter upon said strip of land; and ordered the defendant to rebuild a fence along the west line of plaintiffs’ right of way.
The original complaint states that W. C. Kimball conveyed to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Polebitzke v. John Week Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Williams v. Western Union Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Wheelwright v. Pure Milk Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Dyer v. WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hunter v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Pollnow v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Minneapolis Athletic Club v. CohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Konneker v. RomanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- SMB Investments v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.