Schimmel v. Dundon
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.
We are obliged to reverse the judgment because of plaintiffs’ failure to establish their own title tO' the disputed strip of land.
The action is one to quiet title, and therefore plaintiffs must prove that they have title to the tract in suit. They cannot prevail on the mere weakness of defendants’ title. State v. Gether Co. 203 Wis. 311, 315, 234 N. W. 331; Kidder v. Pueschner, 211 Wis. 19, 22, 247 N. W. 315.
Defendants’ deed was recorded long before either the Kranzes or plaintiffs purchased the other lot. Therefore both Kranzes and plaintiffs were conclusively charged with *102knowledge of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hartung v. WitteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Thiel v. DamrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. LehmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Peters v. ReichenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Kidder v. PueschnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allie v. RussoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Saletri v. ClarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Schimmel v. DundonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957