Legal Opinion

Merrell v. Thomas

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 15, 1985No. Civ. No. 84-6185-EPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES M. BURNS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Paul E. Merrell, a resident of Lincoln County, Oregon, brought this action for injunctive relief to set aside the right-of-way use registrations of seven herbicides issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), or its predecessor, under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), 7 U.S.C. § 136, et seq. The seven herbicides whose right-of-way use registrations have been challenged here are Garlon 4, Krenite, dicamba, simazine, diuron, bromacil, and Rodeo. 2 Plaintiff, however, has not alleged that EPA…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paul E. Merrell v. Lee Thomas, and Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Defendants-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Defenders of Wildlife v. Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
  3. M & H Enterprises v. Tri-State Delta Chemicals, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API