Legal Opinion
M & H Enterprises v. Tri-State Delta Chemicals, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 1998No. 22097PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHRUM, Presiding Judge.
M & H Enterprises, Gary Hogan, and John Maddox (“Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s order granting the Respondents’ motions for summary judgment. Appellants sought damages after a herbicide they had used failed to control weevils in a stored pea crop. The trial court entered both summary judgments on the basis that Appellants’ claims were preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FI-FRA”), 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq. We affirm in part; we reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
In 1992, Appellants, who were brokers and growers of agricultural…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Webster v. Reproductive Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jordan v. PeetMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- M & H Enterprises v. Tri-State Delta Chemicals, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Empire District Electric Co. v. CoverdellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Whipple v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Sparks v. PNC BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.