Legal Opinion

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided July 26, 1985No. IP 83-1862-CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY

DILLIN, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court upon the motions of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Aceto Chemical Company, Inc. (Aceto) to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the following reasons, those motions are granted in part and denied in part.

Memorandum of Law

Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) filed this lawsuit against Aceto, the EPA, and the EPA’s administrator. Lilly has alleged that this action arises under the Constitution of the United States and the Federal Insecticide,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kahn v. Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Flotec, Inc. v. Southern Research, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
  3. Powercorp Alaska, LLC v. Alaska Energy AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Landeen v. PhoneBILLit, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
  5. Vance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API